Platinumgirl

an insider’s guide to jewelry

Archive for January, 2009

Internet Diamond Price List and Index

Posted by platinumgirl on January 30, 2009

I have compiled a table of diamond prices.  I researched the diamond prices for common sizes and quality combinations of GIA or AGS certified diamonds from leading diamond websites, including Blue Nile, Amazon.com, Union Diamond, Abazias, Mondera.com, Adiamor, and others.  This list is an up-to-date price that you should pay for each respective carat size, color and clarity.  If you pay close to the prices shown below, you can rest assured you are getting an excellent value for that size/quality of diamond.

Why does this exist?  This list is intended to reduce the complexity of the diamond listings you will find online.  Many listings will show almost identical diamonds with large price variances due to the different vendors those companies buy from and their pricing algorithms.  This price list shows a rational, logical approach that tries to distill the information in a transparent way. 

I will research and update these prices each month.  I will also compare the diamond prices to previous month’s prices and will report on the relative changes through the Internet Diamond Price Index.  Because this is the first month, January 2009, the idazzle.com Index is 100.

idazzle.com Internet Diamond Price List
January, 2009
Competitive prices for each Size, Color and Quality combination        
All are Very Good or Ideal Cut                
                       
idazzle.com Diamond Price Index (IDCX) = 100    
                       
    *Index is compared to diamond prices in Januaray, 2009      
                       
                       
  0.25 ct IF VVS1-VVS2 VS1 – VS2 SI1 – SI2 0.75 ct IF VVS1-VVS2 VS1 – VS2 SI1 – SI2
D 655 549 523 509   D 7,004 4,256 3,162 2,350
  E 641 537 513 505   E 5,148 4,225 3,370 2,228
  F 632 524 509 499   F 4,563 4,201 3,138 2,203
  G 627 518 507 495   G 3,977 3,389 2,843 2,140
  H 605 ` 489 475   H 3,964 2,946 2,297 1,868
  I 588 486 475 462   I n/a 2,762 2,281 1,673
  J 566 468 458 445   J 2,518 2,218 1,455 1,339
                       
  0.33 ct IF VVS1-VVS2 VS1 – VS2 SI1 – SI2 1.00 ct IF VVS1-VVS2 VS1 – VS2 SI1 – SI2
D 1,130 873 663 515   D 18,101 11,846 7,787 5,610
  E 1,112 758 588 465   E 12,223 11,318 6,767 4,606
  F 1,059 751 578 449   F 11,792 9,656 6,632 4,387
  G 874 672 568 435   G 8,219 7,965 5,689 4,313
  H 826 659 544 430   H 7,360 6,800 4,830 4,224
  I 780 651 442 355   I 6,170 5,610 4,339 3,566
  J n/a n/a n/a 379   J 4,540 3,942 3,553 3,123
                       
  0.50 ct IF VVS1-VVS2 VS1 – VS2 SI1 – SI2 1.50 ct IF VVS1-VVS2 VS1 – VS2 SI1 – SI2
D 3,048 2,290 1,466 1,107   D 43,232 28,461 18,996 11,028
  E 2,663 2,213 1,376 1,102   E 32,097 27,624 18,751 10,363
  F 2,424 1,870 1,321 998   F 24,706 22,256 14,853 10,270
  G 2,073 1,673 1,180 975   G 19,825 18,310 12,705 9,248
  H 1,972 1,446 1,134 955   H 13,357 11,619 10,832 8,136
  I 1,625 1,173 1,033 751   I 12,211 10,955 8,955 7,379
  J n/a 937 702 594   J 9,751 9,531 7,239 6,293
                       
  0.60 ct IF VVS1-VVS2 VS1 – VS2 SI1 – SI2 2.00 ct IF VVS1-VVS2 VS1 – VS2 SI1 – SI2
D 3,958 2,981 2,031 1,567   D 85,205 55,171 34,726 18,478
  E 3,056 2,549 2,018 1,370   E 60,534 51,693 33,090 18,250
  F 2,984 2,264 1,884 1,298   F 44,708 43,280 31,467 18,192
  G 2,479 2,235 1,729 1,250   G 32,394 30,433 22,881 15,604
  H 2,382 1,985 1,263 1,005   H 31,719 29,617 19,333 14,963
  I 2,350 1,978 1,172 997   I 23,874 20,033 14,488 13,845
  J n/a 1,654 1,023 950   J n/a 16,809 12,566 11,548
                       
                       
  Copywrite idazzle.com LLC 2008
www.idazzle.com                  

Posted in diamond education, diamonds, internet diamond price lists, loose diamonds | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Designer Spotlight: Mark Patterson

Posted by platinumgirl on January 30, 2009

Mark Patterson creates beautiful jewelry in colored gems and diamonds.  I worked with his designs for a number of years when I was with a couple of independent jewelers.  The first designs I fell in love with were mostly colored gemstones that were used with varying intensities and pave-set into designs that showed off the amazing graduation of color.  His wife, Josette, is a sculptor and you can really see that sensibility in the designs:
18 Kt White Gold, app. 2.90 ct tw Blue Sapphires, .40 ct tw Diamonds

Mark Patterson Sapphire and Diamond Intensity Ring, app $4520 Retail

When I was a buyer of engagement rings, I was thrilled to find out that Mark was doing engagement ring and wedding band designs.  His engagement rings are mostly timeless designs with a slight twist that makes them special.  He uses pave diamonds and beautiful metal work to highlight the center stone without overpowering it.  Of his classic designs, I especially like the knife-edge setting, which is simple but sculptural:

Platinum Knife Edge Mtg, app. Retail $3790

Platinum Knife Edge Setting, app $3790 Retail

The split-shank design is comfortable, impressive and does a great job of emphasizing the center stone.  Shown here with pave diamonds, but also available plain:

Platinum Pave Diamond Split Shank Setting, app $4050 Retail

Platinum Diamond Split Shank Setting, app $4050 Retail

While his engagement rings are simply gorgeous, you can tell that color is still his first love.  His newer collection, Samba, plays with the varying shades of colored gemstones in a very modern style that is still classic enough for fine jewelry:

Samba Ruby and Pink Sapphire Bracelet, app $9670 retail

Samba Ruby and Pink Sapphire Bracelet, app $9670 retail

His new 9 two 5 collection features large cabochon gemstones set into a mix of sterling and gold.  It is also pretty affordable.  I especially love the interesting combinations of colors, like this:

Kashmir Cabochon Rings, starting at $630

Kashmir Cabochon Rings, starting at $630

All of Mark Patterson’s designs are beautifully rendered.  You can find a retailer in your area by visiting his website, or call their studio at 866-221-6593.

Posted in designer jewelry, diamonds, engagement rings, jewelry, online jewelers, online reviews, rings, silver jewelry | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Virtual Purchase: 1/2 Carat TW Round Diamond Stud Earrings

Posted by platinumgirl on January 26, 2009

Several times a month, I am going to do a “virtual purchase” of a piece of jewelry.  I will  articulate a jewelry purchase scenario, and go through the decision-making process of what, how and where I choose to “purchase” the item.

What:  This week’s virtual purchase will be a pair of 1/2 carat tw (total weight) round diamond solitaire earrings in simple white gold mountings, with nice sparkle without overpaying for quality you can’t see.  While this is a popular size for diamond earrings, keep in mind that these will be smaller than you think–the 1/2 carat diamond total weight is spread across 2 stones, so each is 1/4 carat and the typical diameter is about 4mm each.  Click here for a neat little graphic from Blue Nile illustrating relative diamond size. 

Where: I am going to shop online at Costo.com, Blue Nile, Amazon.com, Walmart.com, Diamond.com, Diamondstudsonly.com, and Union Diamond.  NOTE: unlike loose/solitaire diamonds, earring of this size won’t typically have independent diamond reports/certificates from the major grading labs.  I am only going to sites where I am reasonably confident that I would get the quality that is stated on the website.

Here are the results, click here if you need help on the diamond 4C’s terminology:

Company: Mounting Metal: Min Color: Min Clarity: Cut:  Price:  Comments
Amazon.com 18 kt H-I SI2 VG  $521.99 Excellent value, cryptic price messaging
Diamondstudsonly.com 14 kt G-I SI2 VG  $599.00 If they can deliver this quality, it’s a good option
Union Diamond 14 kt H-I SI1-SI2 NA  $600.00 If they can deliver this quality, it’s a good option
Blue Nile 18 kt I SI2 Good  $700.00 OK value, nice site, consistent quality
Costco.com 14 kt I VS2 Good  $799.99 Nice value for higher clarity, probably can’t see difference
Walmart.com 14 kt I-J I1-I2 NA  $499.00 Not comp quality, not recommended
Diamond.com 14 kt H-I I1 NA  $695.00 Not comp quality, not recommended
Bottom Line:  If I were purchasing for myself, I would purchase the Amazon.com pair.  They have the best quality/value ratio for the $521.99 price.  However, I don’t know how long the “sale” will last, so if they discontinue the sale price, I would recommend either the diamondstudsonly or the Union Diamond pair.  If you are really into higher clarity, the Costco pair might do it for you.  As with all jewelry purchases, it takes some research and legwork to compare, and it can get confusing for the lay person.  Not all diamond earring quality combinations are equal across different companies, as the table above shows.  Below are my notes about the specific details of the merchants and their offerings, and links to the exact pairs reviewed.
Costco.com:  Yes, their site is clunky–the refining browse structure is just awkward.  But their prices are usually very good, they tend to have nicer qualities, and are scrupulous about quality control.  They have a smaller selection than other sites, but they have a nice pair of 1/2 carat tw round diamond earrings set into classic 14kt white gold baskets, I color or better, VS2 clarity or better for $799.99.  I know from industry reputation that their cut quality is pretty good.  That price includes shipping, and the site says you can have them in 2-3 days.

Blue Nile:  Beautiful site, pretty intuitive to browse for earrings.  At Blue Nile, you can build your own pair of earrings by selecting matched pairs of diamonds and a mounting style of your choice, or you can choose from popular sizes/shapes already mounted.  The most likely pair of round diamond studs was 1/2 ct tw, I color or better, SI2 clarity or better, good cut, set into 18 kt white gold screwback settings for $700.  You can get them next day for free if you order by a certain time.  These are slightly lower clarity than the Costco pair, but at SI2 you are unlikely to see any inclusions with the eye, and you get better mountings for almost $100 less than the Costco pair.

Amazon.com:  If you click on Amazon’s Jewelry catagory, they have a “Diamond Stud Earring” heading in the left nav that takes you to this page set up with all of their pre-set diamond earring choices in popular shapes/sizes/qualities.  The round diamond stud earrings in 18k white gold basket settings with a regular friction back are H-I color, SI2 clarity or better, and very good cut (which will give you great sparkle) for $869.99 retail plus shipping, which doesn’t sound competitive with BN or Costco.  BUT, there is a sale of 40% off applied when you actually put the item in your cart and go through the purchase process until the final “submit”.  The final price is $521.99 which is an excellent value.  I don’t think shipping is free unless you are an Amazon.com Prime member.  But I find the whole pricing strategy to be odd.  These earrings have a $2380 retail, which is TOTALLY ridiculous!  Then they have their published discounted price of $869.99, which is high.  The final price of $522 is very good, but it’s not transparent and difficult to get to. 

Walmart.com:  Platinumgirl shops at Walmart for jewelry, you say?  Well, they are the largest retailer of jewelry in the US by volume, and this is a basic item, so I figure I should check it out.  The site is terrible–you can’t sort for size, quality, even shape.  I finally found a pair of 1/2 carat tw round diamonds, H-I color, I1-I2 clarity, in 14k white basket settings for $499.  These are in no way comparable to the other diamond earrings I found at other sites–I just don’t recommend an I2 for anything–and probably not pretty at all.  The Amazon.com pair is light years ahead of these and for not much more ($521 final price).

Diamond.com:  Surprisingly, since they are a jewelry-specific site, I find this site to be challenging.  For all the browse refinements in the left navigation, I still have to wade through a bunch of stuff to find the round solitaire 1/2 tw studs.  The closest I could come to the other contenders was this pair, at H-I color, I1 clarity for $695, in very un-appealing 14k white gold screw back settings.  I would not recommend this pair.  For the same price (or lower, in Amazon’s case), Blue Nile  and Amazon both have finer quality.

Diamondstudsonly.com:  I am giving this site a try, since it comes up at the top of Google search results.  You can sort of “build your own” by selecting diamond shape, mounting style and metal type, and diamond quality ranges.   I selected what we have been comparing: 1/2 ct tw, G-I color, SI2 clarity, very good cut in 14kt white gold basket settings for $599, with free Fed Ex 2 day shipping.  This is a good value.  Only drawback is that I’ve never ordered from them before and don’t know if they are being spot-on with their quality grading.

Union Diamond:  Since I found their selection and pricing very good on my virtual purchase of a 1 carat solitaire, I thought I would check them out for diamond studs, too.  The site is OK.  You can choose from a drop-down menu of mounting options, so I selected their 14kt white gold basket settings.  The detail page says 1/2 ct tw, H-I color, SI1-SI2 clarity for $600.  Free Fed Ex shipping is included.  If the cut is good to very good, this pair is right in the range of Diamondstudsonly.com and Amazon.com for pretty comparable quality.

Posted in diamond earrings, diamond education, diamonds, earrings, jewelry, online jewelers, online reviews, virtual purchase | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Virtual Purchase: 1 Carat Round Diamond

Posted by platinumgirl on January 13, 2009

Several times a month, I am going to do a “virtual purchase” of a piece of jewelry.  I will  articulate a jewelry purchase scenario, and go through the decision-making process of what, how and where I choose to “purchase” the item.

What:  This week I am looking for a 1.00 carat round diamond, loose.  My “customer” wants the nicest quality he can afford, but won’t go below 1.00 carat weight.  I am only going to look at diamonds with an AGS or GIA certificate so there is some confidence that I will get the diamond quality I’m expecting. 

Where: I am going to shop online at Blue Nile, Amazon.com, Diamond.com, and Union Diamond.

(The Gold Standard) Blue Nile:  I go to Blue Nile first.  I do a search for loose diamonds that can be mounted by a specific date (if you are more flexible on date, there are more results), 0.90 to 1.15 carat, Very Good Cut or better, I Color or better, SI2 Clarity or better.  There are 246 diamonds in my search result.  Now it’s time to refine.   I review this primer on diamond quality 4 Cs, so I know that cut is important.  I sort for that and find that only 2 of the 215 diamonds are Very Good Cut, the rest are Ideal or Signature Ideal.

I know that color is also important, so I sort for that next, high to low.  I decide that a D or E color, while beautiful, are much more expensive than the equally gorgeous F and G color, and that VS2 to SI1 clarity seems like a nice range.  So I check the compare boxes next to a few combinations of F and G color, VS2 and SI1 clarity, Very Good, Ideal and Signature Ideal cut, and hit the ”Compare” button at the top of the column.  It opens a new page with the diamonds listed side-by-side in a neat comparison format. 

I remove 3 diamonds right off the bat, due to medium to strong blue Fluorescence.  It doesn’t really affect beauty that much in faint to medium (and may make the diamond more attractively priced), but while it might actually help me out if I were purchasing an I or J (or lower) color, in a premium color diamond, it’s not that desirable.  The diamonds that are left range from $5300 to $8800–kind of a big price spread.  I rule out the 2 highest priced diamonds (over $8000), mainly because there is nothing significantly better about them than the others.  Wearing my Gemologist hat, I scrutinize the numbers for a while.  I ultimately choose a 1.09 ct F, SI1, Signature Ideal for $6783.  What tips me this direction is that it has a 60% depth percentage with a 56% table, so its diameter is going to appear slightly larger than the other top contender at 62% depth/55% table.  The actual diameter measurement is also slightly larger, but I know I’m not sacrificing beauty for that, because it’s a Signature Ideal cut with the certificates to show for it.  It wasn’t the cheapest, but it was right in the middle of the pack ($5300 low to $7600 high).

(The Mighty) Amazon.com: Now that I have a more precise picture of what I’m looking for, I head to Amazon.com (is there anything they don’t sell now?).  As an Amazon.com insider (see here to read more), I know that Amazon tries to be the lowest price in loose diamonds whenever they can.  At Amazon’s site, you can find their loose diamond/Create Your Own Diamond Ring selection on their Jewelry gateway page, or by clicking here

I adjust the sliders to find diamonds in the same quality range I used for Blue Nile, with a price cap of $10,000.  I figure out (through trial and error) that Amazon’s slider is not as sensitive as Blue Nile’s so I have to move the slider up to 1.25 ct in order to get diamonds over 1.00.  I get 631 results.  Their compare feature does not have the same level of detail as BN’s–there are no measurements or girdle thickness, you have to click through to the detail page for each stone to find out those details.

I found a great 1.08 F, SI1 ”Ideal” cut (meaning that the table and depth percentages fit into the Ideal range), that looked like a great value at $5775.  But closer inspection revealed that it said “Very Good” under the Polish and Symmetry comments, so it’s not technically the same as the Signature Cut Ideal from Blue Nile.  But if you weren’t so picky about that, it would be a great value.  Since the G, VS2 combination was $1000 more, I stuck with the F, SI1 quality combination.  The final diamond at Amazon that is most comparable to the BN diamond is a 1.07 ct F, SI1, Ideal cut for $6610.  I like the 55% table/61% depth combination, and it’s diameter is 6.6 mm, similar to the BN diameter of 6.7 mm.  If I wanted about the same factors, but was willing to go down in size slightly to 1.00 ct exactly, Amazon had a nice diamond for $5940, but the diameter is slightly smaller at 6.46 mm.   

(Disappointing) Diamond.com:  I couldn’t find a great comp at Diamond.com.  The closest I could find was a 1.03 ct, F, SI1, Ideal cut for $5908.  It is not as large, and had medium blue Fluorescence, which I rejected at the other companies.  The selection was dismal, maybe 4 diamonds that were even close.

(The Darkhorse Surprise) Union Diamond: Union Diamond seems to come up a lot in search engines, so I checked them out, too.  Closest comparable diamond: a very nice 1.06 ct, F, SI1, AGS-certified Ideal cut for $6435.  If it is as nice as the website says, it’s one of the best values I came across, especially if the company could verify if the AGS certificate identifies the diamond as a “000″ Ideal (Ideal proportions, Polish and Symmetry).  The only drawback is that I’m not as familiar with the company, so I can’t give a full endorsement without ordering something.

Final Diamond Virtual Purchase:the 1.07 ct F, SI1, Ideal from Amazon.com.  While any of my top three diamonds (my top pick from BN, Amazon.com and Union) would have been incredibly brilliant, I like the value proposition of the price in the middle ($6435 from Union Diamond, $6610 from Amazon, $6783 from BN), PLUS the safety/reputation of Amazon.com.  If I get some personal experience with Union, or hear from someone who has, then I might go with that option.

Bottom Line:  With certified diamonds, you can–in theory–easily compare all the factors online and then buy something that should be a beautiful diamond.  The reality is that it’s pretty confusing trying to sort through literally hundreds, even thousands of similar diamonds that all have tiny differences that seem to affect value significantly.  It’s important to remember that although it seems like there are so many details to consider, at some point it’s splitting hairs–if you are staying in a quality range of Very Good Cut, I color, SI2 and better, you will end up with a gem with plenty of sparkle.  I chose an Ideal, F color, SI1 as a gorgeous diamond quality with an excellent value proposition.  A lot of people think that a G, VS2 combination is an ideal engagement ring, but most of those diamonds were $1000 or more for that quality combo, and I prefer the higher color–you can’t see the difference in clarity at all from VS2 to SI1.

Of course, if you go to a reputable jeweler in your area, you could compare several qualities and see for yourself if there is a difference worth paying for.

Posted in diamond education, diamonds, engagement rings, loose diamonds, online jewelers, online reviews, physical jewelers, rings, virtual purchase | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Cellini Asscher Cut Diamond Ring

Posted by platinumgirl on January 13, 2009

Santa, I think you forgot this…

Regards,

platinumgirl

PS: I have been VERY good this year

Updated 4/9/2009:  Considering how much traffic this page gets (a LOT), I thought I should get some more information about these rings. 

I spoke to Danielle at the Cellini store in the Hotel Waldorf-Astoria in NYC (Cellini also has a store at 509 Madison Ave).  She said that the images of the rings are representative of what they can do with a diamond from their inventory or your own diamond.  OK, maybe not just ANY stone, the mountings work best with the shapes shown, a square Emerald cut or Oval.  Also, the center stone should be at least 3 carats, in order for the mounting to be proportionate.  It might just be too much metal with a stone smaller than 3 carats (see my post about Asscher cut diamonds here, there are some nice pave settings for diamonds smaller than 3 carats).  The retail for the setting is around $9500 in platinum.  A 3 carat Asscher or Oval shape around G color, VS2 clarity (my choice for best quality combination) will run around $35,000.  Cellini would be happy to help you find the right diamond, of course.  For what it’s worth, Danielle said that as beautiful as the photo is, the rings are really much prettier in person, she recommends trying one on if you’re ever in NYC.  

If you like this style, but you’re interested in a different shape of center diamond, you can check out their Spring 2008 catalog, there is another version on the cover of this catalog that could work for a Cushion or other shape center.  Click here to download.

Here’s a link to Cellini’s website, or call the very lovely Danielle at 212-751-9824.

Posted in designer jewelry, diamonds, engagement rings, jewelry, online jewelers, physical jewelers, rings | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Diamond 4 Cs, Version 2.0

Posted by platinumgirl on January 3, 2009

It seems that most jewelry sites have almost the same diamond education information out there, verbatim.  There is a difference between providing technical information versus explaining how to interpret and use the information practically when shopping for diamonds.  Here is an abbreviated primer, with my notes based on helping customers select the right diamond.

Cut:  I would say that this is the most important C, since the optical brilliance of the diamond is tied to its proportions and angles.  The top flat facet of the diamond, called the table, should be a certain percentage relative to the diameter of the diamond.  The depth percentage (specifically the depth of the lower part of the diamond) should also fall into narrow tolerances, along with specific angles of the crown and pavilion.  In addition to these percentages and angles (called Proportion), the quality of the polish (how smooth the surface of the facets are), and the symmetry of the facets are also part of the overall cut characteristics.  Unlike the other C’s, there are multiple ways to grade cut.  GIA (Gemological Institute of America)grades a diamond in the following terminology:  Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, and Poor.  AGS (American Gem Society)grades cut using numbers 0-10, with 0 representing an Ideal grade.  You will also see terms like near-Ideal, Fine Cut, etc.  These terms don’t mean a lot, and can vary in their accuracy depending on who is doing the grading.  You can actually find out a diamond’s potential cut grade if you know a few of its specific measurements through GIA’s Facetware Cut Grade Estimator.  Note:  These grades and proportions apply to Round diamonds.  If you are looking at another shape, they are evaluated a little differently.  More guidance on that in another blog.

Bottom Line: Understanding the Cut grade is critical to the value of the diamond.  Ideal and Excellent cut grades from grading labs such as GIA and AGS translate to beautiful diamonds with incredible sparkle.  They will also cost more.  Even a diamond that is E color and VVS clarity will not have beautiful brilliance unless it is cut very well.  If you can splurge on just one C, I recommend going with as fine a cut grade as possible.  Especially for an engagement ring, this is important.

Color:  Color in diamond terminology refers to the relative absence of color in the stone.  If a diamond is absolutely colorless, it will reflect the most pure spectrum of colors.  The diamond color scale begins at D (complete absence of body color) and goes to Z.  Colors D, E, and F are considered colorless, with minute differences only visible if the diamond is turned on its side and viewed against a neutral background.  G, H, I and J are considered near-colorless.  G, H, and possibly I all look quite white in a face-up, mounted position.  J can start to have a slight tint of color to it when in the mounting, but it’s really a case-by-case judgement. 

Bottom Line:  When choosing a color for a diamond, D, E, and F are fabulous, but they can also be costly due to their rarity.  If you have the budget and want to prioritize, you can’t go wrong with a colorless diamond.  If you want to balance the other factors (cut, clarity, and carat), especially in an engagement ring, you could consider a G or H–both are spectacular when mounted.  If  you are less sensitive to color (some people just can’t see the subtlety), an I or J could work great, especially in other diamond jewelry like earrings, bracelets, and pendants.  Color grades K through Z would be suited for fashion items.

Clarity:  Diamonds are graded on their relative freedom of inclusions.  Inclusions are small characteristics that are within the diamond, such as pinpoints or tiny crystals of carbon, and feathery fractures.  Most of the time, these are incredibly minute, only visible with the aid of a 10x power microscope.   

Diamonds with a Flawless (F) or Internally Flawless (IF) grade have no internal characteristics visible under 10x, and are incredibly rare.  VVS1  and VVS2 clarity grades are also rare, and it is very difficult for an expert to see the internal characteristics under 10x.  Inclusions within VS1 and VS2 clarity grade diamonds are still quite difficult to see under 10x magnification.  SI1 and SI2 clarity diamonds have inclusions that are somewhat easy to see under 10x, but can rarely be seen with the unaided eye.  Included diamonds, graded I1, I2 and I3, have inclusions numerous and noticeable enough that you can see them somewhat easily with the eye. 

Bottom Line:  Clarity is one diamond factor where you can have some flexibility.  You can choose diamonds from IF to SI2, and you probably won’t be able to see any inclusions with the eye.  That gives you a lot of room to play with, and can be a way to control the ultimate price you pay for a diamond.  Personally, I think that Vs2 to SI1 would be a gorgeous, no apologies clarity for an engagement ring or more important piece of jewelry.  If I wanted to maximize size, or it is for a piece of jewelry like an earring or bracelet, SI2 would be a great option as well.  If you are not concerned about inclusions or just can’t see the difference, you can get a larger stone for the money by going with I1.  I don’t recommend I2 or I3: the beauty is just too compromised, and there are durability issues.

Carat:  This C is the most objective of all the factors; it is simply how much the diamond weighs.  Diamonds are valuable, so they are weighed very precisely on a metric scale to the hundredth of a carat.  One carat is divided into 100 parts, called points.  A diamond that weighs .49 ct is described as 49 points, or almost 1/2 carat.  Diamonds are routinely cut into standard fraction sizes of 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 3/4, 1, etc.

Bottom Line:  Small differences in carat weight can translate to large differences in value.  Sometimes you can maximize value by going with a carat weight just under the standard fraction sizes (a .90 ct versus 1.00 ct).  Really, you will just have to balance carat weight with other quality factors.  You will never regret higher quality, so if you have to choose color and cut over size, that’s a good way to go.  If size does matter (who are we kidding, of course it does!), then perhaps choosing a larger, well-cut diamond in the H-I color, SI2 clarity range might just get you what you want.

Posted in diamond education, diamonds | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »